FedRAMP picks up speed, but sharing lags
It doesn't take as long to get a cloud service approved under the Federal Risk Authorization and Management Program, but agencies are uneven in their embrace of FedRAMP, a new study suggests.
Coalfire, a cybersecurity management and compliance firm, crunched data from both the FedRAMP marketplace and industry cloud service providers and found that the average time to FedRAMP authorization was now six months, which amounts to a 59 percent improvement for cloud service providers working directly with agencies, and a 65 percent improvement for those working with the FedRAMP Joint Authorization Board.
"That's tremendous process improvement," Dave McClure, Coalfire's chief strategist for federal, told FCW, a sister site to Government Cloud Insider. He also noted that a substantial number of FedRAMP-approved CSPs are now relatively small firms.
"While FedRAMP is supposedly is tailored for large companies that can afford the price tag of going through the process," McClure said, roughly 14 percent of the firms had 2016 revenues of $10 million or less. The cost of securing a FedRAMP authorization, according the report, now ranges from $350,000 to $865,000.
"The scope is widening," he said, "and you're getting broader participation rather than just the large integrators with their cloud solutions."
But McClure, who helped to launch and champion FedRAMP while leading the General Services Administration's Office of Citizen Services and Innovative Technologies during the Obama administration, said agency efforts still have a ways to go.
The report estimates that 60 percent of agencies do not yet participate in the program, even though FedRAMP authorization is mandatory for virtually all cloud services used in the federal government. Six large cabinet departments -- Commerce, Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security and Interior -- are using at least 20 different authorized clouds, but many more agencies remain in single digits.
And despite FedRAMP's stated goal of re-using authorizations to save time and cut costs, more than half of the authorized cloud services are being used by only one or two agencies.
McClure cautioned that this data draws on agencies' own reporting back to the FedRAMP program management office, which is not mandatory and so does not always reflect every authorization. But in general, he said, "where we found the gap was in small and medium-size agencies," where the commitment to cloud is sometimes still tentative.
While some of that can be attributed to size and budget -- and may change "as the price and timeline for FedRAMP come down" and more low-impact, software-as-a-service offerings become available, McClure said the disparities in cloud adoption also come down to leadership.
Agencies like DOD and HHS have had "leadership in place that have said they're aggressively moving to cloud solutions," he said, while many of the lagging agencies "have culturally been resistant to cloud, or skeptical of its use or security."
"Every agency in the government can benefit from cloud solutions," he argued. "It's a question of whether the CIO, the CISO, the CTO and the agency head are all in agreement that it's cost-effective and it's secure."
The Coalfire report suggests several areas where CSPs can help to improve and accelerate the authorization process, but McClure said changes are needed on the government side as well -- above and beyond the steps being taking by the FedRAMP team itself.
"It's going to require policy or transparency in reporting by the agencies," he said, to force the cultural change and get hesitant chief information security officers and CIOs to trust the security work done by others. "The baselines are the baselines," he noted. "If I'm unwilling to accept another agency's baseline assessment, I still should not have to start from scratch."
McClure was optimistic, however, that those changes can be made. Legislation is "brewing on the Hill again on FedRAMP," he said, and "we want to get these kind things built into that legislation if it starts taking shape: More transparency on reporting, more required reporting, so that we truly know how much security cloud we have around government. "
Troy K. Schneider is editor-in-chief of FCW and GCN.
Prior to joining 1105 Media in 2012, Schneider was the New America Foundation’s Director of Media & Technology, and before that was Managing Director for Electronic Publishing at the Atlantic Media Company. The founding editor of NationalJournal.com, Schneider also helped launch the political site PoliticsNow.com in the mid-1990s, and worked on the earliest online efforts of the Los Angeles Times and Newsday. He began his career in print journalism, and has written for a wide range of publications, including The New York Times, WashingtonPost.com, Slate, Politico, National Journal, Governing, and many of the other titles listed above.
Schneider is a graduate of Indiana University, where his emphases were journalism, business and religious studies.
Click here for previous articles by Schneider, or connect with him on Twitter: @troyschneider.